Can you imagine basking in the sun while enjoying a plate full of fresh fruits, vegetables, whole grains and lean meats? Between each serving of food or meal, do you sip a glass of good wine, aware of your location surrounded by hikers, cyclists and small slopes dotted with olive trees?
Well, whether you can or not, that’s the scenario offered by one of the latest diet programs available. Dr. Connie Gutterson’s Sonoma Diet is a weight loss plan that promotes the healthy, flavorful eating style of the Mediterranean and Sonoma Valley, California. But is all this self-promotion, self-marketing an illusion to attract customers, or does it really work?
This article answers that question by detailing the pros and cons of the Sonoma diet to help future dieters determine if the program is right for them.
The Sonoma diet:
The Sonoma Diet is extremely simple for dieters to use. There are no formulas to calculate like with the Weight Watchers program, and no counting of grams or calories per day. Plate and bowl sizes are used more for portion control.
– FOCUS ON THE POSITIVE:
The Sonoma Diet Program emphasizes what you eat rather than what you can’t eat. Although the program still has a list of prohibited foods that dieters are supposed to avoid.
– ENJOY THE FOOD:
The Sonoma diet emphasizes eating more slowly and savoring food. This is punctuated by healthy use of fine wines with meals after the initial 10 day period. By using tasteful recipes, meals are enjoyed and by slowing down diets, they avoid overeating.
The Sonoma diet has a strong nutritional component, encouraging dieters to eat a number of phytonutrients and antioxidants. This is essential for the diet as it is based on nutrition and not starvation. The dieter stays healthy and maintains their metabolic rate at an efficient level.
– COMPLETE FOOD ACCENT:
Emphasizing whole foods in the diet and very few processed foods helps dieters improve their health and lose weight.
– STRUCTURED PLAN
There are certainly several weight loss programs and diets that do not have a prescribed structure for their participants to follow. One of the strengths of the Sonoma diet is its step-by-step guide, but this is obviously a personal choice of each individual.
The Sonoma diet:
– LACK OF FLEXIBILITY
A diet analysis proves that the majority of Wave 1 menus only offer around 950-1100 calories for women and 1050-1300 for men. Once you get to wave 2, the diets only get an extra 200-300 calories. Although it is effective in losing weight, it is difficult for people to live. People will starve in the first week and in the long run this is not sustainable for most dieters.
– LACK OF ORIENTATION IN CASE OF HUNGER
Given the levels of hunger some may experience while on the Sonoma Diet, there is a lack of instruction on what to do and what to eat when hungry.
– LIMITED SIZES, ESPECIALLY VEGETABLES
Compared to most other diets, the Sonoma diet has an extremely controlled volume of food, especially when it comes to vegetables. The lack of available vegetables may be unintentional, but people will usually go into shock about how much food they can eat while sticking to the Sonoma Diet portion sizes.
– PROHIBITED FOODS
With its emphasis on whole foods, the Sonoma Diet does an excellent job of providing nutrients to dieters. However, the number of prohibited foods does not leave dieters with so many alternatives or substitutes in terms of sugars, fats, etc. This can be difficult for dieters to manage.
– LACK OF CARBOHYDRATES IN WAVE 1
In many diets, the risk of falling carbohydrates exists. However, the Sonoma diet is designed as a low-carb diet and has no way of dealing with this risk, which can occur in the first phase of the diet, wave 1.
In conclusion, it is clear that the Sonoma diet offers both advantages and disadvantages for potential dieters. It’s important for each dieter to approach these questions based on their own personality and make a decision that works for them personally. If you like a structured diet focused on flavor, health, and wellness, the Sonoma Diet is for you. However, if you require a greater level of flexibility and feed consumption, an alternative may be recommended.